 |

Do Mobile Phones have to rule our lives?
There's a potentially incendiary notion that we have become slaves to our cell-phones.
That what once was a brick of gold - equal in weight, dimension and value
- with wireless communication technology, which was used rarely and only for
essential, important conversations, has evolved into the dreaded tangled
mess of a phone that is glued to the ear of every typical suburban teenager.
Meaning, the expensive "mobile" phones of the past have been replaced with the
affordable, pocket-able cellular phones of the present, giving everyone the
ability to chat wherever the hell they please.
Now, isn't that convenient?
Until, of course, the phone in your pocket goes off in the middle of the movie
theater, prompting the half-head-turn from the row in front. Or worse
yet, the full-turn-dirty-look.
And then, there are the times at dinner when the person you're with, their
phone goes off, and all three parties, you, your friend and the caller, must
play a bastardized version of the call-waiting-face-off game (coined by Dan
Arey, I believe). In this game, contestant number one, your friend, is called
upon to choose between you, in the flesh and blood, and the caller, who was
too busy to come to dinner, but nonetheless had a few minutes to chat.
You know how this ends. Because faced with you - you're not going
anywhere soon - and someone calling - hey, who knows when they'll call
again? - the choice is obvious. If it were purely for the novelty of "talking
wireless", you'd think it would eventually wear off.
You'll find there are those rare occasions when the calling party is
an intruder on dinner. But those times the caller won't even make it past the
caller-ID tryouts. Sorry, you don't even qualify to be a contestant.
Then there is the Number One Most Embarrassing Situation Known to Japanese
Girls Today. Which is having their friend's cell-phone go off and not having
theirs ring also. Because really, they've played this game before and they know
that that is the only possible counter move. If pulled off correctly?
Deuce.
You'd be surprised how often the score is tied up, even when more contestants
are playing. I'll never forget driving down La Cienega, looking in my rear view
mirror, and seeing four people -- looking buttoned-down yet hip, a perfect Benetton
cross-section -- cruising in a late-model SUV, all talking simultaneously, but
in separate worlds. All of them were talking on cell-phones.
Of course, I don't really know if they all got calls.
Making a call while your friends are already on their phones is a feeble
maneuver that garners exactly zero points. Shame on you.
 |
|
Returning
to the Los Angeles cellular phone community after a six month hiatus,
danchan signed up with AT&T yesterday in Monterey Park, home of the
best cellular deals in L.A.
|
In an increasingly wired (or now, wireless, I suppose) world, we are inundated
with so many options to keep in touch... the cell-phone being the most
convenient and the most immediate.
Do you really want to be permanently reachable? Sure. That's not a
bad thing, especially in emergencies. Being connected does offer its advantages.
But do you really want to always be available for casual conversation? There
is something to be said for wanting something you can't have. And taking for
granted what you can.
Where I'm coming from? I say, bring those shiny new Nokias out, because you
may be running late. Or maybe "something suddenly came up." Or maybe we're both
lost, driving in circles. Catching up, chewing the fat, shooting the breeze?
That can wait until we're face to face. Or at the very least, it can wait until
we're talking one on one.
|
 |