 |

22 Jul 2001
Sony DSC-S85 4.1 Megapixel Digital Camera Review
by theVooner
[A word about the pictures: I took these creative images using
the DSC-S85. The camera pictures were done using a mirror and some Photoshop
magic. They may appear blurred or out of focus, but I did this for
the impact of the image. Also, there are weird angles, which are actual photographs
taken with the use of several mirrors. For real images of the DSC-S85,
go here.]
Greetings
all.
Im sorry that I have been away for some time now. The reason is two-fold
- 1) I was away on a business for 2 weeks, and 2) more importantly though, on
that business trip, I was ROBBED! Yup, careless me got taken by a band of criminals
in Milan, Italy so I lost it all. Laptop, digital camera, mobile phone, you
name it, GONE! Took me another 4 days to get a new passport, plane ticket, etc.
just so I could leave Europe. In the end I made it back to Hong Kong and its
been a mixture of anger, fear, relief, and sadness. Im mad that I lost
all my stuff, but at the same time relieved that I wasnt injured. I hate
that I have to fear for my personal belongings and my own safety thanks to criminals.
When all is said and done, Im sad that I had to lose my stuff but thankful
that I made it back.
Instead of getting down about losing my stuff, I decided to pick myself up
and try to find a silver lining. Well you guys are it. I guess, now that Ive
lost so much, Ill be buying a whole bunch of new stuff. Ive already
got a new mobile phone (a review will come). A laptop too will also follow in
due time. But I thought for the purpose of theVooner.com and High Gear, it would
be impossible to function without a digital camera.
So
here I am, sans a digital camera. I knew I didnt want to just buy the
same Nikon
880 again, even though I loved the camera. (Not to mention that I still
have the charger because they only stole my briefcase, bastards!) I looked at
the market to see whats available. BTW, for a really in-depth look at
whats available for digital cameras not to mention a detailed review
of the DSC-S85, go to www.dpreview.com.
From the cameras that I remembered, I leaned very heavily in favor of the Canon
Digital Ixus or the Sony P1. But I just could not accept the lower 2.1 megapixel
resolution of the Ixus nor the fact that Sony now had a better model available.
There are only a few 4+ megapixel cameras available at the moment. First to
market has its advantages. My choices were fairly limited. No Nikon; no Canon.
Theres Fuji, Sony, and a few others. My preference for brands, in case
you didnt already know, is pretty much Sony first, others next. So I already
had a bias for the Sony.
I read the spectacular review on dpreview.com
and I have to admit that I was pretty much sold. So I went out, and after about
45 minutes of price shopping, I purchased my new digital camera. As I mentioned
right at the beginning, I apologize if the pictures featured here are not that
detailed as some of the other reviews. I dont have another digital camera
to take a picture of this digital camera, so youll have to excuse me as
I find other creative ways to show you the camera.
Form
The
DSC-S85 (why is there no catchy name like the VAIO?) is shaped like the DSC-S75
model. It looks and feels very much like a standard 35mm camera. First of all,
this DSC-S85 is a very beautiful metallic black. It is extremely sturdy and
has an excellent finish. One thing that did strike me though was that the camera
is heavy. Relative to what I remember of the Nikon 880, this camera is much
heavier. I think it has to do with the fact that this seems to have a very strong
metallic body whereas the Nikon had plastic elements. Anyway, its great
in feel and appearance, but I dont know if the weight will be a hindrance
for daily usage and traveling.
The buttons are easily accessible, and I really like that there are a lot of
different buttons for different functions available on the back of the camera
(next to the LCD screen). This provides a user with access to a number of functions
and options with just the flick of the button. Theres a jog-dial at the
side of the camera, which also is very useful when you are flicking through
different options, like adjusting the white balance, focus, etc.
So far, this is the best designed digital camera that I have owned. Aesthetics,
ergonomics, and just plain balance has this as a winner, lets see if the
pictures are any good
Function
It
takes beautiful pictures. Enough said. Yes, 4.1 megapixels is great. Subjectively
they look as good if not better than the 3.3 megapixel. Intuitively, it has
to be. I tried taking a few pictures of similar things to try to get a far comparison.
The automatic setting on the Sony is a bit better. But I did like the different
function choices you got with the Nikon. Im still learning
the Sony so this is all new. So far its been really good. Easy to use
and once I learn all the functions and buttons, this camera will really fly.
There really isnt much else to say. It takes great pictures. Yes, Im
aware that this is not a true 4.1 megapixel, but to me these are semantics.
The resolution, detail and quality of the images are just better than what I
took before.
You get a standard 6X digital Zoom which is actually very good. The Carl Zeiss
lens is pretty much standard these days with Sony cameras. I do like the video
function. With the switch of a button, you're taking video mail. You get decent
time because they do a good job compressing the file, and it was easy to send
the file on e-mail. Other cameras have similar functions, but this one is particularly
easy to use. Set the dial to the movie selection and push a button. I remember
my old Nikon, I had to choose options, select video clip or something,
then press enter, etc. This one just seemed easier. You get about 90 minutes
of video on a 128MB Memory Stick.
Battery
life is AWESOME. One thing I didnt like too much with the Nikon was that
the battery tended to die before I got through a 128MB card (about 80 images).
This one survived my picture frenzy and had a bunch of battery life still left.
On the downside though, this is a Sony battery so if you do happen to run out
of power, youre out of luck unless you want to purchase an extra one.
Also, the charger for the Sony is huge. This sucks because I had hoped it would
be small so that traveling with it is simple. But then again, the Nikon 880
was no picnic as well as the charger was just as big. I also want to say that
I hate the fact that Sony creates so many different battery sizes for different
products.
One comment on the memory stick: Ok, it sucks that Sony has created this proprietary
memory format. Yeah, its more expensive. So far the cheapest I could find
a 128MB for is US$130 versus the <US$100 for an equivalent compact flash
card. Compact flash has a 256MB and upwards while the memory stick actually
just came out with the 128MB version. I wonder how long well have to wait
for a 256MB version? I did just see on the Lexar website that they will soon
have Memory Sticks available. Ill be waiting. On the other hand though,
I now have a number of products (minus one Vaio) that use the MS so I guess
as a memory format, I can only support it.
Installing the software and the driver for the DSC-S85 is a breeze. Remember,
I initially had problems with the Nikon 880, having to go to their website to
download the right driver. I just put in the CD-Rom and we were off and running.
You only get a USB cord, but what else would you need these days? You also get
a nice Sony shoulder strap, but in truth, for a camera like this,
you need a strong hand strap. So I had to borrow the one for my mobile phone.
You also dont get a cover for the camera, which is pretty standard these
days (not to get one, that is). Luckily, to ice the deal, the electronics shop
I bought the DSC-S85 from threw in two different bags. Not a big deal though
because I still have a few digital camera bags from my Nikon.
Factor
In
the end, what can I say? I had to lose my digital camera to find this one. As
one of the first 4.1 Megapixel cameras, the Sony DSC-S85 is a spectacular wonder.
For what I paid, I have to admit that it wasnt a bad deal (I paid about
US$850 for the original version). However, a few days later, a colleague
of mine paid just US$700 for the unofficial version (i.e. parallel
import). Thats not a bad deal at all. As a digital camera, the DSC-S85
is a winner and your ESSENTIAL buy. So while
it unfortunately took me losing my Nikon 880 for me to find this camera, Im
glad it was available because its the best thing out there right now.
theVooner can be reached theVooner@yahoo.com
|
 |